Senegal - Grupo I
đžđł Senegal, the Teranga sprint to 2026 đŠđ„
An unbeaten qualifying run, a steel defense, and one wild night in Kinshasa that told the story of a team built to survive and strike.
Introduction
Senegalâs road to 2026 doesnât read like a long, tortured novel. It reads like a team arriving early, sitting in the front row, and never giving up its seat. There were nights of controlled authority in Diamniadio, quiet, professional trips where a single goal was enough, and one match that felt like a full season compressed into 90 minutes: falling behind, refusing to panic, turning the volume up, and leaving with the points.
This was not a campaign of constant fireworks. It was something more valuable over ten matchdays: a steady hand. Senegal moved through Group B with the posture of a side that knows what it wants from each game. Sometimes that meant overwhelming an opponent before the first coffee cooled. Sometimes it meant walking away with a clean sheet and a 0â0 that still served the bigger picture.
When the numbers land, they land hard. Senegal finished first in Group B with 24 points, unbeaten across 10 matches, scoring 22 and conceding only 3, for a goal difference of +19. That is the kind of statistical signature that doesnât just top a table; it defines it. In a group where the runner-up reached 22 points, there was no margin for drifting. Senegal didnât drift.
The hinge moments arrive with dates attached. On 18 November 2023, Senegal opened with a 4â0 home win over South Sudan: a statement delivered early, with goals in the 1st and 6th minutes and the feeling that the door to the group might close quickly for everyone else. On 6 June 2024, the 1â1 draw at home to DR Congo offered a different lesson: Senegal could be sharp, but it wouldnât always be simple; an 85th-minute equalizer against them forced patience. And then came 9 September 2025 in Kinshasa: Senegal winning 3â2 away after trailing 0â2, with the decisive goal in the 87th minute. That match didnât just add three points; it stamped the teamâs temperament into the campaign.
From there, the finish line looked inevitable rather than dramatic. A 5â0 away win over South Sudan on 10 October 2025 and a 4â0 home win over Mauritania on 14 October 2025 were not late surprises; they were the closing argument. Senegal didnât limp into qualification. It ran through the tape.
The Road Through Qualifiers
CAF qualifying for the 2026 World Cup was built as a long league sprint: a group stage where each team plays home and away against every opponent in its group. In this setup, the simplest truth is also the sharpest: win the group, punch the ticket. That structure rewards consistency more than glamour, and it punishes anyone who treats away draws like harmless souvenirs.
Senegal navigated that logic with the discipline of a team that understands the math. Ten matches, seven wins, three draws, zero defeats. The most revealing detail is not the 22 goals scored, impressive as it is; itâs the three conceded. Over 900 minutes plus stoppage time, Senegal almost never gave the opponent a clear path into the game. In a group where DR Congo reached 15 goals scored, Senegalâs defense still held the line.
The table shows just how tight the top was. DR Congo finished second on 22 points: two behind, close enough to apply pressure, never close enough to pass. Sudan were a distant third on 13 points, while Togo, Mauritania, and South Sudan trailed further back. This mattered because Group B wasnât a walk. Senegal could not coast. One slip, one defeat, and a two-point cushion disappears instantly. The campaign demanded a team that could win both loud matches and quiet ones.
The opening day set a tone. On 18 November 2023, Senegal smashed South Sudan 4â0 at home. The scoring pattern is worth noting: an early goal, another almost immediately, then more before halftime and after. Thatâs the profile of a team that doesnât negotiate with underdogs; it imposes. Three days later, on 21 November 2023, Senegal drew 0â0 away to Togo. In isolation it looks like a dropped opportunity; in context it was the first sign of a campaign where Senegal would bank points even when the finishing wasnât present.
The middle of the campaign mixed control with reminders that qualification is never a straight road. On 6 June 2024, Senegal drew 1â1 at home with DR Congo, conceding late. Three days later, on 9 June 2024, they went to Mauritania and won 1â0. That sequenceâfrustration at home, professional win awayâtells you about the teamâs emotional balance. It didnât wobble; it corrected.
March 2025 delivered another pair of games that looked modest on the surface and heavy underneath. A 0â0 draw away to Sudan on 22 March 2025, followed by a 2â0 home win over Togo on 25 March 2025. When a group is tight at the top, the ability to follow a sterile draw with a clean, controlled win is often the difference between âin the raceâ and âqualified.â
Then came September and October 2025, the stretch that built Senegalâs finishing kick. First, 2â0 at home over Sudan on 5 September. Then the Kinshasa storm on 9 September: down 0â2, Senegal won 3â2. After that, the campaign didnât so much end as it accelerated: 5â0 away to South Sudan on 10 October, and 4â0 at home over Mauritania on 14 October. Those final two results didnât just inflate the goal difference; they removed any doubt about who had owned the group.
Table 1: Senegal matches in CAF Group B qualifying
| Date | Group | Matchday | Opponent | Venue | Result | Goalscorers | Stadium and city |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18 November 2023 | B | 1 | South Sudan | Home | Senegal 4â0 South Sudan | Matar Sarr (1'), ManĂ© (6', 56' pen.), Camara (45') | Stade Abdoulaye Wade, Diamniadio |
| 21 November 2023 | B | 2 | Togo | Away | Togo 0â0 Senegal | Stade de KĂ©guĂ©, LomĂ© | |
| 6 June 2024 | B | 3 | DR Congo | Home | Senegal 1â1 DR Congo | I. Sarr (45+1') | Stade Abdoulaye Wade, Diamniadio |
| 9 June 2024 | B | 4 | Mauritania | Away | Mauritania 0â1 Senegal | H. Diallo (27') | Stade Cheikha Ould BoĂŻdiya, Nouakchott |
| 22 March 2025 | B | 5 | Sudan | Away | Sudan 0â0 Senegal | Martyrs of Benina Stadium, Benghazi | |
| 25 March 2025 | B | 6 | Togo | Home | Senegal 2â0 Togo | Matar Sarr (35'), Boma (67' og) | Stade Abdoulaye Wade, Diamniadio |
| 5 September 2025 | B | 7 | Sudan | Home | Senegal 2â0 Sudan | Koulibaly (14'), Matar Sarr (41') | Stade Abdoulaye Wade, Diamniadio |
| 9 September 2025 | B | 8 | DR Congo | Away | DR Congo 2â3 Senegal | Gueye (39'), N. Jackson (53'), Matar Sarr (87') | Stade des Martyrs, Kinshasa |
| 10 October 2025 | B | 9 | South Sudan | Away | South Sudan 0â5 Senegal | I. Sarr (29', 54'), ManĂ© (46'), Jackson (60' pen.), C. Ndiaye (75') | Juba Stadium, Juba |
| 14 October 2025 | B | 10 | Mauritania | Home | Senegal 4â0 Mauritania | ManĂ© (45+1', 48'), I. Ndiaye (64'), H. Diallo (85') | Stade Abdoulaye Wade, Diamniadio |
Table 2: Group B standings
| Pos | Team | Pts | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Senegal | 24 | 10 | 7 | 3 | 0 | 22 | 3 | +19 |
| 2 | DR Congo | 22 | 10 | 7 | 1 | 2 | 15 | 6 | +9 |
| 3 | Sudan | 13 | 10 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 8 | 6 | +2 |
| 4 | Togo | 8 | 10 | 1 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 10 | -5 |
| 5 | Mauritania | 7 | 10 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 13 | -9 |
| 6 | South Sudan | 5 | 10 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 19 | -16 |
The table tells a clear story, but the splits give it texture. At home, Senegal played five matches: four wins and one draw, 13 goals scored and 1 conceded. Away, five matches: three wins and two draws, 9 scored and 2 conceded. That away column matters most. Unbeaten teams are usually built on traveling well; Senegal did, keeping clean sheets in three of five away games and scoring enough to turn narrow margins into points.
The campaign also shows a controlled relationship with âone-goal games.â Senegal won 1â0 away to Mauritania and handled several matches where defensive cleanliness mattered more than volume. But they also had the ability to turn matches into routs: 4â0, 5â0, 4â0. That combinationâwin ugly, win loudâis what the qualification format rewards.
Finally, the race against DR Congo sharpened the edges. With a runner-up on 22 points, Senegal could not afford a late wobble. The 3â2 comeback in Kinshasa wasnât just the highlight reel; it was the insurance policy. Without that win, the final matchdays would have carried a different kind of pressure. Senegal made sure they didnât need to negotiate with nerves.
How they play
From the results alone, Senegalâs identity comes through in two clean lines: it protects its goal like a priority, and it can score in bursts when the match opens up. Conceding three goals in ten qualifiers is not an accident; itâs a habit. It suggests a team comfortable managing game statesâespecially once it finds the first goal.
The first goal often changes the match for Senegal. Look at the big wins: 4â0 over South Sudan, 5â0 away to the same opponent, 4â0 over Mauritania. These are not games that drift into 2â0 through late chaos. They are games where Senegal scores, then keeps scoring, while keeping the opponent away from the emotional âone moment and weâre back in itâ zone. Even when the opponent is already beaten, Senegal stays serious enough to avoid conceding the consolation goal that can complicate goal difference and rhythm.
The rhythm of Senegalâs campaign also shows a strong tolerance for tight games. Two 0â0 draws away (at Togo and at Sudan) reveal a team that doesnât force reckless solutions when finishing doesnât arrive. In many qualifying groups, those are the matches where a contender loses control, chases, gives up transition chances, and returns with a 0â1 defeat. Senegal returned with clean sheets and points.
There is also a valuable clue in the Kinshasa comeback: Senegal can absorb discomfort without collapsing. Going 0â2 down away to the direct rival and still winning 3â2 requires not only quality but a kind of internal orderâplayers keeping decisions simple enough to stay in the match, yet brave enough to attack. The winning goal arriving in the 87th minute suggests a team still alive late, still believing in its patterns, still willing to risk for a win when the moment demands it.
Numerically, Senegalâs attack is both productive and, in key moments, diverse. Across the ten matches, the goals are spread: ManĂ© appears repeatedly, I. Sarr contributes multiple times, Matar Sarr is a constant presence on the scoresheet, and there are contributions from names like Camara, Gueye, N. Jackson, C. Ndiaye, Koulibaly, H. Diallo, and I. Ndiaye, plus an own goal forced against Togo. That matters because it reduces the âsingle switchâ vulnerability: opponents canât focus all their defensive attention on one finisher and expect Senegalâs threat to vanish.
Defensively, the patterns point to clean-sheet control more than chaotic shootouts. Seven matches with zero goals conceded out of ten is a defining feature. The rare moments of vulnerability are concentrated: the 1â1 at home to DR Congo (late equalizer conceded) and the two goals conceded away to DR Congo (even in a win). That suggests the most uncomfortable scenario for Senegal is not a deep block that refuses to play; itâs an opponent that can land punches in quick succession and force the match into a more open, emotional phase. Senegal survived it once with a comeback. The lesson is still useful: reduce those spells, and the ceiling rises even higher.
If there is a strategic takeaway from these numbers, it is this: Senegal doesnât need chaos to win, but it can handle chaos when it finds itself inside it. And in tournament football, that is a rare and valuable combination.
The Group at the World Cup
Group I lays out Senegalâs first act at the World Cup in three distinct chapters, each with a different tone. First: France vs Senegal on 16 June 2026 at MetLife Stadium in New York/New Jersey. Second: Norway vs Senegal on 22 June 2026, again at MetLife. Third: Senegal vs a rival still to be determined, on 26 June 2026 at BMO Field in Toronto, with the opponent coming from the intercontinental play-off pathway.
Itâs notable that Senegalâs first two games are in the same stadium. That can work as a quiet advantage: fewer variables, less logistical noise, more familiarity with the setting. Tournament football is often decided by small comfortsâroutine, rhythm, the ability to focus on the pitch rather than the trip. Senegalâs qualifying profile suggests it appreciates those margins.
The opener against France is, by nature, a match that tests your capacity to defend without surrendering the possibility of scoring. Senegalâs qualifying record offers an argument for survival: three goals conceded in ten qualifiers is a defensive rĂ©sumĂ©. But a World Cup opener is also a psychological test. The goal for Senegal, judging by its best away performances, is to keep the game in a âlow-scoring neighborhoodâ for as long as possibleâno rushed risks, no cheap concessions, and a focus on making the opponent work for every clean entry.
The second match against Norway comes with different pressure. After the opener, groups often split into those who are calm and those who are forced to chase. Senegalâs qualifiers show a team comfortable collecting points even when the match is tight, which is a useful trait in the second group game, where a draw can still be a building block depending on the table. The goal is to avoid the emotional swing that can happen after an opening result, whether good or bad.
The third match is where the narrative usually demands clarity. Senegal faces Rival por definirse, saldrĂĄ del repechaje internacional Llave B: Bolivia, Surinam o Irak. The rule for these matches is simple and brutal: you do not give away the start. Senegalâs campaign began by scoring in the 1st and 6th minutes against South Sudan; it also ended with emphatic wins. That is the template emotionally: impose, simplify, and turn the match into something Senegal can manage.
Table: Senegal group stage fixtures
| Date | Stadium | City | Opponent |
|---|---|---|---|
| 16 June 2026 | MetLife Stadium | New York / New Jersey | France |
| 22 June 2026 | MetLife Stadium | New York / New Jersey | Norway |
| 26 June 2026 | BMO Field | Toronto | Rival por definirse, saldrĂĄ del repechaje internacional Llave B: Bolivia, Surinam o Irak. |
Match by match, the likely scripts are clear enough without pretending certainty. France vs Senegal looks like a game where Senegalâs first mission is to stay connected defensively and keep the scoreline short. Senegalâs qualifying habits suggest it can do that, especially when it refuses to concede early. Prediction in plain language: draw.
Norway vs Senegal could tilt toward the team that controls the emotional temperature. Senegalâs unbeaten run and its comfort in away environments point to a side that can take points even when the match is uncomfortable. Prediction: draw.
Senegal vs Rival por definirse, saldrĂĄ del repechaje internacional Llave B: Bolivia, Surinam o Irak, reads like the kind of match Senegal must treat as a professional obligation. Not because the opponent is to be judged in advance, but because Senegalâs own standardâset over ten qualifiersâis to protect its goal and generate enough chances to win. Prediction: Senegal win.
To close the group-stage picture, the keys for Senegal are practical, not poetic:
- Keep the first halves clean: the entire qualifying campaign was built on defensive stability.
- Treat set-piece moments as gold, both ends: in tight matches, one goal changes everything.
- Avoid the âtwo-goal spellâ scenario seen in Kinshasa; tournament games are less forgiving.
- Use goal distribution as strength: multiple scorers means multiple ways to solve a match.
Editorial opinion
Senegal arrive as a team that respects the job. Not the noise around it, not the headlines, not the temptation to chase beauty for beautyâs sake: the job. Over ten qualifiers, they built a profile that tournament football usually rewardsâclean sheets, controlled wins, and the ability to travel without losing shape. If youâre looking for a shortcut description, itâs this: they donât give you gifts, and they donât need many to hurt you.
But the World Cup doesnât care about your rĂ©sumĂ©; it cares about your next 15 minutes. Senegalâs biggest assetâcalm controlâcan become a trap if it turns into passivity. The line between âmanagedâ and âflatâ is thin when the opponent has enough quality to punish one sleepy sequence. Senegalâs mission is to stay proactive within its own discipline: defend well, yes, but also keep the match alive for itself.
The warning, concrete and written in Senegalâs own ink, is hidden inside the most glorious night of the campaign. On 9 September 2025 in Kinshasa, Senegal conceded twice and needed a comeback to win 3â2. It was heroic, it was thrilling, it was the kind of match that builds belief. It is also the kind of match you donât want to need in a World Cup group, where the margins are narrower and the punishment comes faster.
If Senegal keep the clean-sheet habits that carried them to 24 points and first place, they will be hard to move. If they drift into the kind of early wobble that forced them to chase in Kinshasa, even their strength can turn into a rescue mission. And rescue missions are expensive at the World Cup.